While normally I tend to stick to issues relating to personal finance, stocks, and the market on this blog; I believe the answer here lies in a related realm. I think this one simple fact seems to be forgotten by many policy makers, green activists, and other environmentally concerned...
Being Green Must Be Economic, Otherwise Motivation Of The Masses Is Lost!
Here are a few examples of what I am getting at:
- Ontario's The Beer Store, which interestingly is actually owned by Labatt, Molson, and Sleemans, runs what is probably the best example of 'Economic Green' I can think of. The Beer Store's returnable bottle system claims a re-use rate of 99% for regular beer bottles. Each bottle is typically used 12 to 15 times. I wonder how many bottles would make it back to the store or find their way into blue boxes if customers could not receive the $0.10/bottle that The Beer Store doles out? What a fabulous success story of environmentalism. So that Heineken that we all drank to celebrate the moneygardener's one year birthday could have been swigged on by 14 people before toasted to Walgreens and Household Savings Rates, that's about as green as it gets. All of this because most people won't turn down an easy dime.
- The City of Woodstock, Ontario's garbage collection program has residents paying $1.25 to purchase a tag that they affix to each of their weekly garbage bags in order to have them picked up at the curb. This is 'Economic Green' at its best. Every city should implement such a program and perhaps we'll all use the first 'R' more often (REDUCE). Don't charge me a flat fee for collection inside property taxes, instead a pay-per-use system like this is true green motivation.